What happened to personal pronouns?
Jan. 31st, 2009 08:00 amDid the rules change, when I was asleep? How does anybody write a sentence like this - 'She has always performed well in the time she has been with ourselves'? That was in the reference letter from the employer of someone I interviewed for a job yesterday. For goodness sake, the word is 'us'!
And while I'm on one of my periodic language rants...
The English language has lots of words, and very, very few of them are perfect synonyms. It's what makes the language such fun, the fact that there are specific words that allow for subtle nuances of meaning.
I mean, when you appreciate something, it is a personal emotion experienced by you. When you are appreciative, you demonstrate your appreciation to the object or to the world in general. That's different, right?
I know that I’m fighting a losing battle with this one, but really, disinterested is not a synonym for uninterested. If you are not interested in something, you are uninterested. If you are disinterested, it means that you don't have a vested interest in it. It has occasional overtones of being altruistic.
And I know the language is constantly evolving, but some things just sound wrong. Why do I have to even say it? - dragged is the past tense of drag, NOT drug. A drug is a medicinal or other chemical compound that has an effect on the workings of the body. Using drug in place of dragged makes you sound illiterate.
(NOTE OF CLARIFICATION - I am using the word illiterate, not as an insult, but as it is defined - 1: having little or no education; especially: unable to read or write 2 a: showing or marked by a lack of familiarity with language and literature b: violating approved patterns of speaking or writing. Ref: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illiterate)
/rant
*sighs* I think I must be getting old. I feel like I should be swirling my brandy glass and saying "When I was young..."
And while I'm on one of my periodic language rants...
The English language has lots of words, and very, very few of them are perfect synonyms. It's what makes the language such fun, the fact that there are specific words that allow for subtle nuances of meaning.
I mean, when you appreciate something, it is a personal emotion experienced by you. When you are appreciative, you demonstrate your appreciation to the object or to the world in general. That's different, right?
I know that I’m fighting a losing battle with this one, but really, disinterested is not a synonym for uninterested. If you are not interested in something, you are uninterested. If you are disinterested, it means that you don't have a vested interest in it. It has occasional overtones of being altruistic.
And I know the language is constantly evolving, but some things just sound wrong. Why do I have to even say it? - dragged is the past tense of drag, NOT drug. A drug is a medicinal or other chemical compound that has an effect on the workings of the body. Using drug in place of dragged makes you sound illiterate.
(NOTE OF CLARIFICATION - I am using the word illiterate, not as an insult, but as it is defined - 1: having little or no education; especially: unable to read or write 2 a: showing or marked by a lack of familiarity with language and literature b: violating approved patterns of speaking or writing. Ref: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illiterate)
/rant
*sighs* I think I must be getting old. I feel like I should be swirling my brandy glass and saying "When I was young..."
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 08:16 am (UTC)*joins you in the library with the brandy glass*
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 08:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 10:32 am (UTC)And what about inquire and enquire being used, especially in crime novels which should know better, as synonyms?
A murder enquiry is: "Was someone murdered?"
A murder inquiry is the investigation into a murder.
I think the problem is, in crime novels, that police make enquiries in the course of an inquiry.
But the difference is so basic and, as I read so many crime novels, my teeth are wearing down.
Perhaps publishers should make enquiries as to how well educated their editors are and inquire into their suitability for the job.
And talking of annoying American-speak, what about "big of a deal" and "very fun"?
Are you a member of... excuse me while I go to find it... yes, riters_r_us ?
There's another one as well but I can't find it right now. rru is good though.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 10:40 am (UTC)*pats brand new Chamberlains*
I bought me the new dictionary the other week because I'm so sick of not being able to find an English dictionary on line. (Well, not a free one, anyway.) Shame you can't cut and paste from a printed book *g*
And then what did I find? My brand new Roget's Thesaurus is in American! An American publication with even the price, on the back cover, in dollars, and yet purchased from Amazon UK. What? They got a job-lot cheap because no other bookseller in Britain wanted them?
*more grinding of teeth*
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 11:19 am (UTC)My line manager is constantly saying "yourselves" instead of "you" and "ourselves" instead of "us".
And now they're trying to get rid of the apostrophe!
Bastards!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 12:38 pm (UTC)I had a massive argument with a fellow teacher some years back who sent back a report I'd written that contained the sentence (roughly) "If Johnny were to work harder his grades would improve". This *English* teacher had crossed out 'were' and written 'was'.
When I pointed out that it was the subjunctive case and that 'were' was correct, the reponse was "What's the subjunctive case?". I took it to her head of department, who had the gall to tell me that I was right but "no-one really cares these days"!
::Bangs head on desk::
The most annoying part of it was that this was back in the days when we wrote reports by hand and she had crossed out in pen. The entire report had to be re-written; not just my comment but all those by the other teachers!
PS. You may well have seen it before but if not... have you come across "The The Impotence of Proofreading by Taylor Mali (http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=OonDPGwAyfQ)"
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 01:17 pm (UTC)Thanks for the rec to that community. I just joined.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 01:20 pm (UTC)I know, I would love to find a free link to Chambers Dictionary online.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 01:22 pm (UTC)*laughs* I know, I heard about that on the radio, last night. They were talking about taking the apostrophe out of King's Lynn, weren't they? Crazy people.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 01:27 pm (UTC)And thank you - Chambers, not Chamberlains *head desk*. Perhaps that's down to my subconcious - it decides to get it wrong because I'm just sulking cause I can't afford the complete Oxford!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 01:28 pm (UTC)*grabs cask* cheers!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 01:33 pm (UTC)Just as well there's been no "dumbing down" of education, then, isn't it?
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 01:33 pm (UTC)Thank you for that link. I hadn't seen it. It was very funny.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 01:35 pm (UTC)That wasn't a correction. I assumed there was another dictionary called Chamberlains. It sounds like a very plausible name for one.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 01:41 pm (UTC)Oh, right. Okay. So that's what it's called.
*grins at you*
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 02:06 pm (UTC)If you've not come across Taylor Mali before then you're in for a real treat. Try "Like, You Know (http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SCNIBV87wV4)" and his others!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 02:12 pm (UTC)The double take was great!
In fact, the only reason I was even aware of the subjunctive case (and most other grammatical info) was because of learning German. The language teachers most definitely believed in teaching grammar!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 03:07 pm (UTC)Oh, I do know that's true, but that Head of English you quoted... not so much. I guess they'd given up.
there was a trend about thirty years ago towards no longer teaching grammar
In the UK too. I'm a product of that education system. But I know people who don't have a single book in their houses, so how it was supposed to work for them, is a mystery to me.
I've just spent three quarters of an hour watching Taylor Mali on YouTube. Thank you so much for the links.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 03:09 pm (UTC)You sing it!! I'm telling you, the things I see grading high school papers is quite enough to turn my hair gray.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 04:36 pm (UTC)I know exactly what you mean. I have nothing against synonyms. Finding the exact word is satisfying, but there are usually others that do the job well enough. My real problem is with people using words that have quite different meaning, as if they were synonyms. *g* We can sit here on the porch and lament the loss of words and their improper use, together, if you like.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 05:50 pm (UTC)And I need drugs when I read drug *holds out tea cup for a top up*
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 06:08 pm (UTC)Ah, Chinese, or any of the non-alphabetic languages, that must create a whole different way of thinking - symbolism and pictures instead of letters. A bit like sign language, I imagine.
My first taming story was a journey through a single dictionary entry, so I understand your fascination.
*hugs you back*
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 06:37 pm (UTC)I know what you mean. I remember Mr Sparrow using 'engender' when he was talking to someone at work and the girl laughed because she thought he'd made the word up. So he had to explain what it meant and when she still didn't believe him, he finished up showing her the word in the dictionary!
I do love thesaurus dipping. Getting just the right word is always such a buzz and it's what makes the English language fun as well as interesting.
Off now....
me xx
no subject
Date: 2009-01-31 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-01 07:18 am (UTC)And then the 'right' word comes to you, just as you're falling asleep at night, long after it could do any good. *g*
no subject
Date: 2009-02-01 07:20 am (UTC)Have fun, hon.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-01 08:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-01 10:13 am (UTC)Not sure I could even read at 7. *g*
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-28 06:52 am (UTC)